Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Am J Audiol ; 30(2): 385-393, 2021 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1805677

ABSTRACT

Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted normal operations of health care services, broad sectors of the economy, and the ability to socialize freely. For those with tinnitus, such changes can be factors in exacerbating tinnitus. The purpose of this study was to determine tinnitus help-seeking behavior, which resources individuals utilized to cope during the pandemic, and what additional support is desired. Method An exploratory cross-sectional study design including 1,522 adults with tinnitus living in North America (Canada and the United States) was used. Data were collected through an online survey distributed by the American Tinnitus Association via e-mail. Free text from open-ended questions was analyzed using the automated content analysis. The responses to the structured questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive and nonparametric statistics. Results Significantly less tinnitus support was sought during the pandemic, and very few respondents utilized tinnitus support networks during the pandemic at the time the survey was conducted. Nonetheless, seeking support during the pandemic was significantly associated with significantly less tinnitus distress. The most frequently utilized resources for coping during the pandemic were contacting family and friends, spending time outdoors or in nature, relaxation, and exercise. Such tools for coping were associated with significantly less tinnitus distress. The support requested and advice provided by participants to health care services had overlap. The main support needs related to managing tinnitus included addressing hearing loss, providing peer support, finding cures, and accessing trained and understanding health care providers to help. The advice for professionals related to tinnitus management included the need for cures, personalized support, addressing hearing loss, targeting the tinnitus percept, and providing more information about the condition. Conclusions These findings provide suggestions on how to better support those with tinnitus at a time when health care is undergoing rapid changes. Findings can be used by stakeholders, clinical practitioners, and tinnitus support services to devise ways to work more effectively together to improve access to patient-driven, suitable, accessible, and evidence-based support. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14558514.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , COVID-19/epidemiology , Help-Seeking Behavior , Tinnitus/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Canada/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Psychological Distress , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tinnitus/therapy , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
J Am Acad Audiol ; 32(9): 562-566, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1692491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess whether the severity of tinnitus, as measured using ratings of tinnitus loudness, annoyance, and effect on life, was influenced by the lockdown related to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. STUDY SAMPLE: The data for 105 consecutive patients who were seen at a tinnitus clinic in an audiology department in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 lockdown between April and June 2020 and 123 patients seen in the same period of the previous year, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic were included. DATA COLLECTION: Demographic data for the patients, results of their pure-tone audiometry, and their score on visual analog scale (VAS) of tinnitus loudness, annoyance, and effect on life were imported from their records held at the audiology department. This was a retrospective survey comparing ratings on the VAS of tinnitus loudness, annoyance, and effect on life for consecutive patients seen during the COVID-19 lockdown and consecutive patients seen in the same period of the previous year, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients seen prior to lockdown used a pen and paper version of the VAS, while the patients who were assessed during the COVID-19 lockdown used an adapted version of the VAS, via telephone. All patients were seeking help for their tinnitus for the first time. RESULTS: The mean scores for tinnitus loudness, annoyance, and effect on life did not differ significantly for the groups seen prior to and during lockdown. CONCLUSION: Any changes in psychological well-being or stress produced by the lockdown did not significantly affect ratings of the severity of tinnitus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Tinnitus , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Self Report , Tinnitus/epidemiology , Tinnitus/psychology
3.
JAMA ; 326(1): 29-30, 2021 Jul 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1318665
4.
Int Tinnitus J ; 25(1): 29-33, 2021 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1256967

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Covid-19 pandemic has caused a profound impact on the lives of people and has given rise to many mental health issues like anxiety and stress which eventually has given rise to bothersome tinnitus. In case of people having pre-existing tinnitus, the pandemic has raised the problem of tinnitus and the co-morbid issues related to tinnitus and severely affected the overall quality of life. Hence, we need to find a mean for home-based management of tinnitus and its associated problems. OBJECTIVE: To understand the mechanism of mental health and to compare between the mindfulness-based tinnitus reduction and tinnitus retraining therapy on android-based application. DESIGN: Comparative and Experimental design. METHOD: The study was conducted on 60 participants and was divided into two groups. Detailed audiological assessment, tinnitus assessment and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Tinnitus Cognitions Questionnaire (TCQ) were administered. Group-I was provided with tinnitus retraining therapy and group-II was provided with mindfulness based tinnitus stress reduction. After the post therapy evaluation the data were compiled for statistical analysis in SPSS software 20.0. Results: It was found that there were significant difference between the pre and post therapy scores of TRT and MBTSR in both THI and TCQ (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Home-based management of tinnitus during the COVID-19 pandemic using both TRT and MBTSR were highly successful and had similar results MBTSR was found to be more useful as it had better outcome in reducing the tinnitus related annoyance and shown better improvement in QOL examination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Mindfulness , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Tinnitus/therapy , Adult , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mindfulness/methods , Mobile Applications , Smartphone , Stress, Psychological/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tinnitus/complications , Tinnitus/diagnosis , Tinnitus/psychology , Young Adult
5.
Ear Hear ; 41(6): 1442-1449, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-900545

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the perceived effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) social distancing restrictions and safety measures on people with hearing loss. DESIGN: Participants were 129 adults (48.1% female, mean age 64.4 years) with an audiometric hearing loss, living in Glasgow, Scotland. A rapidly deployed 24-item online questionnaire asked about the effects of certain aspects of lockdown, including face masks, social distancing, and video calling, on participants' behavior, emotions, hearing performance, practical issues, and tinnitus. Data were analyzed descriptively across the entire sample, and with Chi-squared tests for differences between subgroups self-reporting relatively good and relatively poor unaided hearing, respectively. Additional free-text responses provided further perspectives. RESULTS: Behavior: Video calls are used more frequently than prelockdown. The better-hearing group use their hearing aids less. Emotions: There is increased anxiety (especially among the worse hearing group) concerning verbal communication situations and access to audiology services, and greater rumination about one's own hearing loss. Enjoyment of group video calls is mixed. The worse hearing group shows substantial relief at not being obliged to attend challenging social gatherings. Across both groups, a majority would like to see all key workers equipped with transparent face masks. Hearing performance: A large majority finds it hard to converse with people in face masks due to muffled sound and lack of speechreading cues, but conversing at a safe distance is not universally problematic. In the worse hearing group, performance in video calls is generally inferior to face-to-face, but similar to telephone calls. Those who use live subtitling in video calls appreciate their value. TV and radio updates about Covid-19 are easy to follow for most respondents. There is only weak evidence of face mask fixtures interfering with hearing aids on the ear, and of tinnitus having worsened during lockdown. CONCLUSIONS: With due regard for the limitations of this rapid study, we find that there are many negative-and a few positive-effects of Covid-19 restrictions and safety measures on people with hearing loss. From a societal perspective, the widespread adoption of clear face masks may alleviate some of the difficulties and anxieties this population experience. From an individual perspective, one may consider using live subtitles on video calls. Manufacturers of hearing devices should consider developing processing modes and accessories specifically designed for video calls. Finally, repair and maintenance services should be resumed as soon as it is safe to do so.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Physical Distancing , Adaptation, Psychological , Aged , Anxiety/psychology , Attitude to Health , Auditory Threshold , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/therapy , Disability Evaluation , Female , Health Surveys , Hearing Aids/psychology , Humans , Male , Masks , Middle Aged , Scotland , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tinnitus/complications , Tinnitus/psychology , Tinnitus/therapy , Videoconferencing
6.
Int J Audiol ; 60(5): 322-327, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-809146

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Audiology Department at the Royal Surrey County Hospital usually offers face-to-face audiologist-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for tinnitus rehabilitation. During COVID-19 lockdown, patients were offered telehealth CBT via video using a web-based platform. This study evaluated the proportion of patients who took up the offer of telehealth sessions and factors related to this. DESIGN: Retrospective service evaluation. STUDY SAMPLE: 113 consecutive patients whose care was interrupted by the lockdown. RESULTS: 80% of patients accepted telehealth. The main reasons for declining were not having access to a suitable device and the belief that telehealth appointments would not be useful. Compared to having no hearing loss in the better ear, having a mild or moderate hearing loss increased the chance of declining telehealth by factors of 3.5 (p = 0.04) and 14.9 (p = 0.038), respectively. High tinnitus annoyance as measured via the visual analogue scale increased the chance of declining telehealth appointments by a factor of 1.4 (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Although CBT via telehealth was acceptable to most patients, alternatives may be necessary for the 20% who declined. These tended to have worse hearing in their better ear and more annoying tinnitus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Telerehabilitation/methods , Tinnitus/rehabilitation , Adult , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Hearing Loss/psychology , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tinnitus/complications , Tinnitus/psychology , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL